Rodeo runs your spec meetings. It guides the conversation, asks the questions you'd skip, and writes the spec as you talk. Two sessions. Done.
Walk me through the checkout flow from cart to confirmation.
What happens when the payment processor times out mid-transaction?
How should error states propagate to the user interface?
Edge case detected — the team hasn't covered timeout handling for the payment flow.
Start a Rodeo session. Get your team in the room. Talk about what you're building.
Rodeo listens, asks the hard questions your team skips, and tracks what's been covered and what hasn't.
When you're done, the spec is written.
Structured, attributed, and ready to load into Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex. Your team is aligned. Your agent has context. No document writing required.
Why are we building this? Who is it for? What are the constraints? Rodeo guides the team through purpose, users, and boundaries.
What are we building? Walk through user journeys, define features, surface risks. Rodeo captures every decision and flags what's missing.
Break the spec into tasks, estimate effort, assign owners. Export straight to Jira or Linear.
Shape creates features. Run focused sessions to spec each one out with your team.
Rodeo finds gaps after each session and schedules a focused follow-up. Only the unresolved items — nothing else.
Requirements changed? Open a Revisit. Rodeo loads the existing spec, you talk through what's different, and the spec updates.
While your team talks, Rodeo listens and generates prompt cards in real time — surfacing edge cases you'd skip, challenging assumptions nobody questions, and connecting things across topics.
A traffic light system tracks what's been covered and what hasn't. Red: not discussed. Yellow: open questions. Green: covered. You can see the gaps in real time — and so can Rodeo.
As your team talks, Rodeo builds a structured specification — not a transcript. Decisions, requirements, assumptions, risks. Each item attributed, status-tracked, and ready to load into Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex.
“You've defined the happy path for checkout, but haven't discussed what happens if the payment processor times out.”
// SpecItem — DECISION, confirmed
DECISION: Stripe Connect for platform fees.
source: Sarah (Eng) • confidence: 0.95
// Feeds directly into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex
Skills shape what Rodeo listens for and what it asks. A generic facilitator asks “have you thought about security?” Rodeo with the right skills asks “have you considered PSD2 session token requirements?”
Rodeo's output is a structured spec. Load it into Claude Code or Cursor and your agent builds from real decisions instead of guessing. Or hand it to your developers directly — every requirement is clear, attributed, and prioritized.
Either way: no one writes a document. No one reads a document. The team talks, Rodeo writes the spec.
DECISION: SSR for SEO-critical pages.
source: Architect, Shape session • confidence: 0.95
Loads directly into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot
Send spec to
Three founders, two meetings, one spec. The developer loads it into Claude Code and ships the first feature that week. Every technical decision from the meeting is in the code.
A product team runs a Feature session about the payment integration. 45 minutes later: Problem defined, Scope locked, Flows mapped. The sprint starts with clarity, not guesswork.
Run Rodeo with the client. They talk, Rodeo captures. The client gets a spec they can revisit. The dev team gets structured requirements they can actually build from. No "translating" needed.
Unlimited team members on every plan. Recall sessions are always free.
2 sessions/month · 1 project
8 sessions included · $29/extra
30 sessions included · $25/extra
It's deciding what to build.
Every engagement starts with discovery. Rodeo replaces the mix of notes, decks, and follow-up emails with a structured engagement brief. A better version of the facilitated workshop consultancies already sell.
The building brief is a specification. Clients and architects discuss needs, constraints, spaces, adjacencies. Same pain: the brief is either vague or one person’s interpretation. Different blocks, same method.
Brand sprints, positioning workshops, creative briefs. Structured sessions that currently produce a slide deck nobody references. And increasingly, the downstream consumer is an AI generating copy and campaigns.
Policy development, regulatory assessments, GDPR data mapping. Cross-functional teams discussing complex constraints. Output needs to be structured, attributable, and traceable — exactly what Rodeo produces.
Treatment planning, clinical pathways, trial protocols. High-stakes meetings where specialists align on a plan. Decisions need attribution. Assumptions need flags. Missing considerations can be dangerous.
Curriculum design, research protocols, grant proposals. A research team designing a study has the same problem: complex constraints, lots of discussion, and a structured protocol that needs to come out the other end.
Policy workshops, public consultations, procurement specs. Government procurement specifications are notoriously bad — and they’re written from stakeholder meetings. Structured output helps with accountability and transparency.
Every engagement starts with discovery. Rodeo replaces the mix of notes, decks, and follow-up emails with a structured engagement brief. A better version of the facilitated workshop consultancies already sell.
The building brief is a specification. Clients and architects discuss needs, constraints, spaces, adjacencies. Same pain: the brief is either vague or one person’s interpretation. Different blocks, same method.
Brand sprints, positioning workshops, creative briefs. Structured sessions that currently produce a slide deck nobody references. And increasingly, the downstream consumer is an AI generating copy and campaigns.
Policy development, regulatory assessments, GDPR data mapping. Cross-functional teams discussing complex constraints. Output needs to be structured, attributable, and traceable — exactly what Rodeo produces.
Treatment planning, clinical pathways, trial protocols. High-stakes meetings where specialists align on a plan. Decisions need attribution. Assumptions need flags. Missing considerations can be dangerous.
Curriculum design, research protocols, grant proposals. A research team designing a study has the same problem: complex constraints, lots of discussion, and a structured protocol that needs to come out the other end.
Policy workshops, public consultations, procurement specs. Government procurement specifications are notoriously bad — and they’re written from stakeholder meetings. Structured output helps with accountability and transparency.